Abstract

This paper examines the current erosion of civil discourse as a pressing leadership challenge in an era defined by polarization and distrust. Civil discourse, the respectful and constructive exchange of ideas, underpins democratic societies yet is increasingly undermined by hostile rhetoric and deepening societal divides. Drawing on servant-leadership and relational leadership theory, this study explores how leaders can counteract this decline by fostering trust, empathy, and open dialogue. The discussion is grounded in the philosophical contributions of bell hooks, Friedrich Nietzsche, Viktor Frankl, Mahatma Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr., whose ideas illuminate pathways for revitalizing civil discourse through compassion, truth-seeking, and moral courage. By integrating these insights, the paper argues that leaders must embrace ethical stewardship, active listening, and relational engagement to rebuild credibility and cohesion. It also addresses critiques of idealism by demonstrating that civil discourse does not suppress dissent but channels conflict into constructive outcomes. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for leaders across sectors to model and institutionalize practices that prioritize understanding over domination and collaboration over partisanship. This work contributes a theoretically grounded and actionable framework for leaders committed to restoring thoughtful debate, respectful dialogue, and responsible engagement, which are essential for navigating contemporary challenges and fostering inclusive, resilient communities.

Recommended Citation

Herritage, Katie (2025) "Reviving Civil Discourse: A Leadership Imperative in the Age of Polarization," International Journal of Servant-Leadership: Vol. 19, Article 17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64749/2160-8172 & 2160-8164.1441
Available at: https://repository.gonzaga.edu/ijsl/vol19/iss1/17