Document Type

Article

Publication Title

SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that an embodied cognition theorist has resources available to her to fulfill the explanatory role of communicative intention without postulating inner, private intentions, as is typically done by cognitivists. I argue for this conclusion by identifying a publicity requirement and a sensitivity requirement that must be satisfied by realizers of communicative intentions a theoretical posit that explains the difference between linguistic meaning, as in John means cats are mammals by his utterance cats are mammals, and other sorts of meaning, as in that bell means the train doors are closing. I then show that a cognitivist model and an embodied model of communicative intentions can satisfy these requirements. However, because the embodied model is more theoretically parsimonious than its cognitivist competitor, the embodied model is superior. In the first section, I argue that communicative intentions exhibit the properties of publicity and sensitivity and that whatever satisfies the role of communicative intentions in a theory about cognition must also exhibit those properties. In the second and third sections, I present a cognitivist model and an embodied model of communicative intentions and show that each model exhibits the properties of publicity and sensitivity. In the fourth section, I argue that while both models equally explain the data, the embodied model does so more parsimoniously than the cognitivist model, and this gives us good reason to endorse the embodied model. Finally, I present an objection concerning explanatory power on behalf of the cognitivist and reply to it.

Pages

123-144

html

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1515/sats.2011.010

Volume

12

Issue

2

Publication Date

2011

Keywords

Paul Grice; cognitivism; communicative intention; embodied mind

Disciplines

Philosophy

ISSN

1869-7577

Upload File

wf_yes

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS