Author ORCID Identifier
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Adaptive Behavior
Abstract
In his comment, McGann argues that in my “From Sensorimotor Dependencies to Perceptual Practices: Making Enactivism Social,” I have overlooked a group of enactivist theories that can be grouped under the participatory sense-making label. In this reply, I explain that the omission is due to the fact that such theories are not accounts of perception. It is argued that, unlike participatory sense-making, the approach of the “From Sensorimotor Dependencies to Perceptual Practices” article does not focus on the perceptual aspects of things social, but on the social aspects that are constitutive of perception in general. I conclude by underscoring the central argument of the original article: that the adequate notion to make enactivism about perception social is that of “perceptual practices,” a social practices-based notion of perception.
Pages
161–162
html
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712319835162
Publisher
Sage Publications
Volume
27
Issue
2
Publication Date
3-7-2019
Keywords
Enactivism, perception, sociality, practices, intersubjectivity, culture
Disciplines
Philosophy
ISSN
1741-2633
Recommended Citation
Arango, Alejandro and Burgos, Adam, "Social Enactivism about Perception — Reply to McGann" (2019). Philosophy Faculty Scholarship. 41.
https://repository.gonzaga.edu/philosophyschol/41
Upload File
wf_yes
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Comments
This is the accepted manuscript of the article. The version of record (VoR) is available at the following:
Arango A. Social enactivism about perception—reply to McGann. Adaptive Behavior. 2019;27(2):161-162. doi:10.1177/1059712319835162