Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Management and Organization Review
Abstract
Violators of cooperation norms may be informally punished by their peers. How such norm enforcement is judged by others can be regarded as a meta-norm (i.e., a second-order norm). We examined whether meta-norms about peer punishment vary across cultures by having students in eight countries judge animations in which an agent who over-harvested a common resource was punished either by a single peer or by the entire peer group. Whether the punishment was retributive or restorative varied between two studies, and findings were largely consistent across these two types of punishment. Across all countries, punishment was judged as more appropriate when implemented by the entire peer group than by an individual. Differences between countries were revealed in judgments of punishers vs. non-punishers. Specifically, appraisals of punishers were relatively negative in three Western countries and Japan, and more neutral in Pakistan, UAE, Russia, and China, consistent with the influence of individualism, power distance, and/or indulgence. Our studies constitute a first step in mapping how meta-norms vary around the globe, demonstrating both cultural universals and cultural differences.
Pages
851-870
html
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.42
Volume
13
Issue
4
Publication Date
2017
Keywords
cross-cultural research, individualism-collectivism, meta-norms, norm enforcement peer punishment
Disciplines
Psychology
ISSN
1740-8784
Recommended Citation
Eriksson, Kimmo; Strimling, Pontus; Andersson, Per A.; Aveyard, Mark; and Stivers, Adam W., "Cultural Universals and Cultural Differences in Meta-Norms about Peer Punishment" (2017). Psychology Faculty Scholarship. 12.
https://repository.gonzaga.edu/psychschol/12
Upload File
wf_yes
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Comments
This article has been published in a revised form in Management and Organization Review [http://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.42]. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND licence. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © The Authors.