Ethical Concerns Regarding Use of Formers in "Countering Extremism"

Location

Sasquatch Room 124 C

Start Date

21-4-2023 2:25 PM

End Date

21-4-2023 3:40 PM

Publication Date

2023

Disciplines

Arts and Humanities | Law | Social and Behavioral Sciences

Description

This panel looks at issues of ethics and social justice related to involvement of former members of hate groups (“formers”) in “counter-extremism” and “deradicalization” organizations, projects, and campaigns. Formers are often assumed to have expertise and skills in preventing recruitment into, or disengaging individuals from, violent groups. However, a lack of transparency and oversight of programs makes formers’ skillsets difficult to assess. We argue that the fame, leadership roles, and expert status often conferred on formers is doing harm in several respects. Formers are sometimes less reformed than assumed. In some cases, they have continued to promote hate or have even gotten involved in far-right groups. Even in less concerning cases, centering formers as experts and conferring quasi-celebrity status on them, can serve to further marginalize and disempower those most impacted by hate groups. Rather than a victim/survivor-centered model, use of formers feeds an offender-centered model that tasks communities of color and other targeted populations with “compassionate” outreach to “heal” haters; this emphasis can undermine necessary boundaries that help protect communities from hate groups. The involvement of formers in government-funded Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) programs further contributes to a model that centers the individual psychology of members of hate groups, seeing life trauma as the cause of hate and relying on a securitized and medicalized theoretical framework, rather than addressing social injustice through activism.

Description Format

html

Full Text of Presentation

wf_no

Media Format

flash_audio

Type

Panel

Share

COinS
 
Apr 21st, 2:25 PM Apr 21st, 3:40 PM

Ethical Concerns Regarding Use of Formers in "Countering Extremism"

Sasquatch Room 124 C

This panel looks at issues of ethics and social justice related to involvement of former members of hate groups (“formers”) in “counter-extremism” and “deradicalization” organizations, projects, and campaigns. Formers are often assumed to have expertise and skills in preventing recruitment into, or disengaging individuals from, violent groups. However, a lack of transparency and oversight of programs makes formers’ skillsets difficult to assess. We argue that the fame, leadership roles, and expert status often conferred on formers is doing harm in several respects. Formers are sometimes less reformed than assumed. In some cases, they have continued to promote hate or have even gotten involved in far-right groups. Even in less concerning cases, centering formers as experts and conferring quasi-celebrity status on them, can serve to further marginalize and disempower those most impacted by hate groups. Rather than a victim/survivor-centered model, use of formers feeds an offender-centered model that tasks communities of color and other targeted populations with “compassionate” outreach to “heal” haters; this emphasis can undermine necessary boundaries that help protect communities from hate groups. The involvement of formers in government-funded Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) programs further contributes to a model that centers the individual psychology of members of hate groups, seeing life trauma as the cause of hate and relying on a securitized and medicalized theoretical framework, rather than addressing social injustice through activism.